Pattern comparison

Compare disclosure patterns side by side

Pick 2–4 patterns to compare across strength, friction, placement, legal references and more.

Selected (3/4):
First Interaction AI NoticeContextual AI TooltipAI Use Transparency Footer Link
Dimension
First Interaction AI Notice
Entry-Point Notices
Contextual AI Tooltip
Inline & Contextual Notices
AI Use Transparency Footer Link
Persistent Labels
StrengthStrongSubtleSubtle
Frictionlowlowlow
StatusProduction readyProduction readyProduction ready
TimingFirst time a user opens the AI conversation surfaceWhen you need lightweight clarification on hover/focusAlways, as a baseline
Placement
Top of chat surfaceWelcome message
Adjacent to controlInfo icon
FooterHelp menu
Best forChatbots, Voice assistants, Support agentsInline AI controls, Smart-fill fieldsAny product using AI
Not suitable forPassive background AI featuresFirst-time disclosure of a whole AI systemStandalone disclosure for high-risk features
Legal references
Article 50(1)Article 50(5)
Article 50(1)Article 50(5)
Article 50(5)Code of Practice
Pros
  • Show the notice before the first user message
  • Use plain language
  • Keep it visible without blocking input
  • Trigger on hover AND keyboard focus
  • Keep under 140 chars
  • Link to a plain-language AI policy page
Cons
  • Hide it behind a tooltip only
  • Use vague words like 'smart' or 'automated'
  • Rely on hover only
  • Bury critical info in tooltips
  • Use only 'Legal' as label
Implementation effortMediumMediumMedium
Accessibility considerations
  • Announce via aria-live=polite when the chat opens
  • Ensure notice is reachable via keyboard focus order
  • Accessible via keyboard focus
  • Do not rely on hover-only affordance
  • Descriptive link text

This tool provides product and UX guidance for AI disclosure patterns. It does not provide legal advice and does not determine legal compliance. Please consult qualified legal counsel for binding assessments.